This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Why don't we use the evidence drive for analysis? a. We could, but we would risk losing the ... (Read 17 times)

laurencescou

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 593
Why don't we use the evidence drive for analysis?
 
  a. We could, but we would risk losing the original to which we compare copies.
  b. It is faster to copy it several times and then back to another hard drive than to just use it.
  c. There is no way to prevent altering the drive if we perform analyses on it.
  d. It is usually locked away in an evidence locker and we would have to sign it out on the chain of custody every time we use it.

Question 2

Requests for no-knockwarrants by investigators are not considered even inexigent circumstances.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Tabitha_2016

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

False




Tabitha_2016

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344

 

Did you know?

Sperm cells are so tiny that 400 to 500 million (400,000,000–500,000,000) of them fit onto 1 tsp.

Did you know?

Looking at the sun may not only cause headache and distort your vision temporarily, but it can also cause permanent eye damage. Any exposure to sunlight adds to the cumulative effects of ultraviolet (UV) radiation on your eyes. UV exposure has been linked to eye disorders such as macular degeneration, solar retinitis, and corneal dystrophies.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

Did you know?

Adult head lice are gray, about ? inch long, and often have a tiny dot on their backs. A female can lay between 50 and 150 eggs within the several weeks that she is alive. They feed on human blood.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library