One consequence of the Crawford v. Honig decision was that a) ...

[HCHenry]

One consequence of the Crawford v. Honig decision was that
 
  a) parents of minority school children could request that IQ testing be used to evaluate their child.
   b) IQ testing of minority children for school placement purposes was banned.
  Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
   c) schools were required to provided testing services in the language appropriate for each child.
  Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
   d) school systems were barred from using graduation tests that had high failure rates by minorities.
  Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment

Question 2

A key finding in the 2000 court decision GI Forum v. Texas Education Agency was that
 
  a) high failure rates by minorities on an exam does not mean the exam cannot be used.
   b) standard IQ testing does not discriminate against minority students.
  Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
   c) school systems do not have to provide testing in languages other than English.
  Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment
   d) the racial and ethnic makeup of students in EMR classes does not have to match that of the school as a whole.
  Review several ways that psychologists interface with the legal system in the field of forensic assessment

[popopong]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

a

[HCHenry]

Gracias!

[bdobbins]

Excellent