Homework Clinic

Social Science Clinic => Family Studies and Human Development => Topic started by: Starlight on Jun 24, 2020

Title: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. ...
Post by: Starlight on Jun 24, 2020
Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Which of their arguments is most valid?
◦ Michelle's claim that breastfed babies are ill less often because breast milk has the mother's antibodies in it.
◦ Deana's assertion that bottlefed babies are less likely to have diarrhea and constipation.
◦ Michelle's argument that breastfed babies' psychological development is enhanced.
◦ Deana's belief that bottlefed babies make the transition to solid foods more easily.
Title: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding. ...
Post by: fatboyy09 on Jun 24, 2020
Michelle's claim that breastfed babies are ill less often because breast milk has the mother's antibodies in it.
Title: Re: Michelle and Deana are arguing about the relative benefits of breastfeeding and bottle feeding.
Post by: Marita Smith on Sep 22, 2022
thank you