Homework Clinic
Hands-on Clinic => Nursing and Clinical => Topic started by: crazycityslicker on Jul 8, 2018
-
A nurse researcher submitted an article to a refereed journal. The article will undergo a blind review. What should the researcher expect?
1. Reviewers will sign their comments associated with the review and will return them to the author.
2. The reviewers may or may not be experts in the subject of the article.
3. Reviewers will be unaware of who wrote the article.
4. This group will make the final decision about when the article is ready for publication.
Question 2
Which statement most clearly identifies a distinction between the terms research utilization (RU) and evidence-based practice (EBP)?
1. RU generates knowledge, whereas EBP does not.
2. Changes in nursing practice occur only with EBP.
3. EPB is more limited by financial concerns than is RU.
4. EBP is broader in scope than RU.
-
Answer to Question 1
1
Rationale 1: Reviewers sign their comments in an open review. These comments may be published along with the article.
Rationale 2: Because this is a refereed journal, the reviewers will be experts on the subject of the article.
Rationale 3: A blind review occurs when the reviewers are not told who wrote the article
Rationale 4: The final decision about all aspects of publishing an article is made by the journal editor.
Global Rationale:
Answer to Question 2
4
Rationale 1: Both RU and EBP generate knowledge.
Rationale 2: RU and EBP both result in changes in nursing practice.
Rationale 3: Finances are a concern with both RU and EBP.
Rationale 4: EBP is a broader concept than RU.
Global Rationale: