This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Classical conditioning and operant conditioning differ in that A) classical cond (Read 364 times)

penza

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,022
Classical conditioning and operant conditioning differ in that
A) classical conditioning takes longer.
B) operant conditioning usually involves more intelligence.
C) operant conditioning involves consequences for the animal's behavior.
D) classical conditioning is restricted to mammals and birds.
E) classical conditioning is much more useful for training domestic animals.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by Celeste on Sep 1, 2019

Celeste

  • Hero Member
  • Posts: 588


penza

  • Member
  • Posts: 1,022
Reply 2 on: Oct 27, 2013
Gracias!


kswal303

  • Member
  • Posts: 316
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

The longest a person has survived after a heart transplant is 24 years.

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

Disorders that may affect pharmacodynamics include genetic mutations, malnutrition, thyrotoxicosis, myasthenia gravis, Parkinson's disease, and certain forms of insulin-resistant diabetes mellitus.

Did you know?

In ancient Rome, many of the richer people in the population had lead-induced gout. The reason for this is unclear. Lead poisoning has also been linked to madness.

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library