This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How would Erik Erikson respond to the statement, A midlife crisis is a normal part of the human life ... (Read 193 times)

K@

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 608
How would Erik Erikson respond to the statement, A midlife crisis is a normal part of the human life cycle?
 
  a. He would agree.
 b. He would disagree and point out that there is no normal progression of human development.
  c. He would disagree and point out that crises are not a normal part of human development.
  d. He would say nothing since he focused on development between birth and adolescence.

Question 2

The argument that each psychosocial strength has its own special age period of specific importance is the cornerstone of ____ theory of development.
 
  a. Bandura's
 b. Erikson's
 c. Skinner's
 d. Vygotsky's



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

pocatato

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

b





 

Did you know?

Interferon was scarce and expensive until 1980, when the interferon gene was inserted into bacteria using recombinant DNA technology, allowing for mass cultivation and purification from bacterial cultures.

Did you know?

Nitroglycerin is used to alleviate various heart-related conditions, and it is also the chief component of dynamite (but mixed in a solid clay base to stabilize it).

Did you know?

The most common childhood diseases include croup, chickenpox, ear infections, flu, pneumonia, ringworm, respiratory syncytial virus, scabies, head lice, and asthma.

Did you know?

The use of salicylates dates back 2,500 years to Hippocrates’s recommendation of willow bark (from which a salicylate is derived) as an aid to the pains of childbirth. However, overdosage of salicylates can harm body fluids, electrolytes, the CNS, the GI tract, the ears, the lungs, the blood, the liver, and the kidneys and cause coma or death.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library