Author Question: In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan a. had been discriminated ... (Read 97 times)

Diane

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
In the 1997 case of U.S. v. Hagan, the Supreme Court found that Hagan
 
 

a. had been discriminated against because of whistle blowing.
  b. was innocent of insider trading.
  c. violated the FCPA despite never having gone overseas.
  d. had misappropriated confidential information



Question 2

The Donald Wohlgemuth case shows that
 
 

a. trade secrets can be patented.
  b. trade secrets often become an integral part of an employee's total job skills and capabilities.
  c. employees need to divest themselves of any skill acquired while handling trade secrets.
  d. noncompete or nondisclosure contracts are always legally valid.




ryrychapman11

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 334
Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

b



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Atropine was named after the Greek goddess Atropos, the oldest and ugliest of the three sisters known as the Fates, who controlled the destiny of men.

Did you know?

Bacteria have flourished on the earth for over three billion years. They were the first life forms on the planet.

Did you know?

Human kidneys will clean about 1 million gallons of blood in an average lifetime.

Did you know?

The familiar sounds of your heart are made by the heart's valves as they open and close.

Did you know?

Street names for barbiturates include reds, red devils, yellow jackets, blue heavens, Christmas trees, and rainbows. They are commonly referred to as downers.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library