Bigelow v. Virginia involved the conviction of a Virginia ...

[Ebrown]

Bigelow v. Virginia involved the conviction of a Virginia newspaper editor who published ads about the availability of abortions in New York City the Supreme Court held that:
 a. speech that is related to legal products or services has value in the marketplace of ideas
  b. speech that is not related to legal products or services has no value in the marketplace of ideas c. speech that is malicious in nature has no place in the media
  d. speech that is not malicious in nature may appear in any type of publication
  e. speech that is related to legal products or services can be put in any print publication, but not on televised programs

Question 2

Which of the following restrictions on commercial speech were held to be constitutional by the Supreme Court?
 a. a Virginia law prohibiting advertising in Virginia papers about abortion services in other states when abortion was illegal in Virginia
  b. a Virginia law prohibiting the advertising of prices of prescription drugs
  c. a Kentucky restriction prohibiting lawyers from sending letters to prospective clients, known to face legal problems, soliciting their business
  d. all of the other choices were constitutional
  e. none of the other choices were constitutional

[Animal_Goddess]

Answer to Question 1

a

Answer to Question 2

e

[Ebrown]

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

[bigsis44]

Excellent