Author Question: Alice Barker's home on two acres of land is located in an area where the state has proposed ... (Read 111 times)

Melani1276

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Alice Barker's home on two acres of land is located in an area where the state has proposed construction of a freeway off-ramp. The state has offered Alice 200,000 for her property. Alice believes the market value is 375,000. Alice has the following questions she would like you to answer. a. Can the state take her land? b. Does she have a way to present what she believes the value to be? c. Where can she find the law applicable to this proposed action by the state?

Question 2

The theories of product liability are mutually exclusive.
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



yuyiding

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 357
Answer to Question 1

a. Alice is having her land taken by eminent domain. The state can do so under the Fifth Amendment for a public purpose and a freeway off ramp is very clearly a public purpose.
b. Alice still has due process rights under the Fifth Amendment - the right to present her side on the land's value.

c. Alice has her constitutional protections. Also, there are state laws and regulations that will govern the process of eminent domain.

Answer to Question 2

FALSE



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The highest suicide rate in the United States is among people ages 65 years and older. Almost 15% of people in this age group commit suicide every year.

Did you know?

The average office desk has 400 times more bacteria on it than a toilet.

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

Did you know?

More than 50% of American adults have oral herpes, which is commonly known as "cold sores" or "fever blisters." The herpes virus can be active on the skin surface without showing any signs or causing any symptoms.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library