This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The hemoglobin and hematocrit on a newborn are 18.9 g/dL and 60. How would you interpret these data? ... (Read 23 times)

jerry coleman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 570
The hemoglobin and hematocrit on a newborn are 18.9 g/dL and 60. How would you interpret these data?
 
  a. Lower than expected on a newborn
  b. Higher than expected on a newborn
  c. Expected results on a newborn
  d. Erroneous results that should be rejected

Question 2

Which of the following laboratory values would best correlate with moderate polychromasia on a peripheral blood smear?
 
  a. A low RBC count
  b. A retic count of 8
  c. Schistocytes on the PB smear
  d. A low PLT count



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

johnpizzaz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
Answer to Question 1

Correct Answer: C

Answer to Question 2

Correct Answer: B




jerry coleman

  • Member
  • Posts: 570
Reply 2 on: Jun 25, 2018
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review


debra928

  • Member
  • Posts: 342
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Approximately 500,000 babies are born each year in the United States to teenage mothers.

Did you know?

Approximately 25% of all reported medication errors result from some kind of name confusion.

Did you know?

Ether was used widely for surgeries but became less popular because of its flammability and its tendency to cause vomiting. In England, it was quickly replaced by chloroform, but this agent caused many deaths and lost popularity.

Did you know?

Blastomycosis is often misdiagnosed, resulting in tragic outcomes. It is caused by a fungus living in moist soil, in wooded areas of the United States and Canada. If inhaled, the fungus can cause mild breathing problems that may worsen and cause serious illness and even death.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library