Author Question: In a heated discussion among former classmates, a group of paralegals are discussing a new local ... (Read 76 times)

strangeaffliction · **on:** Aug 3, 2018

In a heated discussion among former classmates, a group of paralegals are discussing a new local rule via e-mail. One of the firm's clients is a perfect example of how the rule can backfire. Which of the following would be a violation of client confidentiality?

a. Jane mentions the client, but only copies the other paralegals in her section of the firm, because they may have to address this situation soon.
b. Jane mentions the client's situation, without the client's name, and disguising some of the facts, and hits reply all.
c. Jane discusses the client's situation openly, using names, because it has been a matter of public record since the case was filed.
d. Jane decides not to participate in the discussion, because it is potentially dangerous to confidentiality.

Question 2

Jamie has been Attorney George's paralegal for five years. She has proven to be quite capable and Attorney George relies on her skills and judgment. One day while the attorney was away, Jamie received a phone call from an insurance company offering their client a settlement. Time is of the essence to accept it. Jamie should:

a. Accept the offer.
b. Negotiate for a higher price.
c. Try to contact her attorney immediately.
d. Nothing. Wait until the attorney returns.