In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
a. reasonable suspicion.
b. a probable cause.
c. a warrant.
d. exigent circumstances.
Question 2
In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
d. private aircraft.
Touchscreen device
This painting depicts New Orleans in 1803, when the city was acquired—along with much of the modern
A fuel pump in a farming area that clearly states the red diesel fuel is for off-road use only ...
Ten Leading Causes of Death in the United States, 2010.
States and territories that have adopted their own version of HAZWOPER for all workers are shown in ...
Prevalence rates of obesity in the United States, 2014