In Kyllo v. United States (2001), the Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without:
a. reasonable suspicion.
b. a probable cause.
c. a warrant.
d. exigent circumstances.
Question 2
In Florida v. Riley (1989), the Court said that aerial observation is valid as long as the police are flying:
a. at an altitude at which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
b. at an altitude above which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
c. at an altitude below which Federal Aviation Administration regulations allow members of the public to fly.
d. private aircraft.
Andrea Bowers, United States v. Tim DeChristopher.
Occupational Prestige: How The United States Compares With Sixty Countries
A fuel pump in a farming area that clearly states the red diesel fuel is for off-road use only ...
Guide to Major Massage Therapy Organizations in the United States*
The Lorenz Curve for the United States, 2009
GDP per Capita in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Japan, 1870–2009