Those who argue against the relevance of international law ...

[ericka1]

Those who argue against the relevance of international law suggest that
 
  a. international treaties and agreements simply are not important.
  b. the International Court of Justice has no enforcement power whatsoever.
  c. international law may at times constrain the behavior of states.
  d. international law is a tool used by powerful states to control weak states.

Question 2

States generally are willing to enforce international law themselves because
 
  a. more powerful states could invade any state that breaks the law.
  b. the International Court of Justice would decide against them anyway.
  c. they tend to benefit from international law.
  d. the United Nations would impose greater sanctions against those states.

[nikmaaacs]

Answer to Question 1

d

Answer to Question 2

c

[ericka1]

TY

[nikmaaacs]

You're welcome