Author Question: How does a zero-sum game compare to a non-zero-sum game? A) In a zero-sum game, one player's gain ... (Read 256 times)

panfilo · **on:** Sep 10, 2018

How does a zero-sum game compare to a non-zero-sum game?

A) In a zero-sum game, one player's gain is by definition equal to the other's loss, whereas in a non-zero-sum game, players' gains and losses cancel each other out.
B) In a zero-sum game, one player's gain is by definition equal to the other's loss, whereas in a non-zero-sum game, it is possible for both players to gain or lose.
C) In a zero-sum game, both players win, whereas in a non-zero-sum game, both players lose.
D) Zero-sum games are more typical in international political economy, whereas non-zero-sum games are more typical in international security.

Question 2

Rationality implies which of the following?

A) States are unitary actors that can think about their actions coherently and make choices.
B) States can identify their interests and put priorities on them.
C) States are capable of performing cost-benefit analysis on actions.
D) States' decisions always have beneficial consequences.