In the Wabash case (1886), the Supreme Court held that: a. ...

[RYAN BANYAN]

In the Wabash case (1886), the Supreme Court held that:
 a. states cannot enact laws that interfere with interstate commerce.
  b. states could restrict price-discrimination based on person, but not price-discrimination based on place.
  c. states could regulate railroad rates on long-hauls, but not rates on short-hauls.
  d. held that railroad practices could not be regulated by any federal or state governing body.

Question 2

Granger laws:
 a. were severely limited in scope through litigation.
  b. generally outlawed both place and person discrimination.
  c. established commissions with the power to investigate complaints.
  d. All of the above are correct.
  e. Only a and b are correct.

[dreamfighter72]

Answer to Question 1

a. states cannot enact laws that interfere with interstate commerce.

Answer to Question 2

d. All of the above are correct.

[RYAN BANYAN]

Gracias!

[juliaf]

TYSM