In the case of Shaw v. Reno (1993), the Supreme Court ruled that
a. majority-minority districts were not a violation of the Thirteenth Amendment.
b. majority-minority districts were unconstitutional.
c. minority-dominated congressional districts were a violation of the Tenth Amendment.
d. minority-dominated congressional districts were not a violation of the Tenth Amendment.
e. redrawing voting district lines from time to time is constitutional.
Question 2
A majority-minority district is
a. a congressional district designed to include so many members of minority groups so that the opportunity for a minority candidate to be elected is greatly improved.
b. a congressional district designed to include so many members of majority groups so that the opportunity for a majority candidate to be elected is greatly improved.
c. a congressional district designed to make it very difficult for a minority candidate to avoid a run-off election.
d. a congressional district designed to make it very difficult for a majority candidate to avoid a run-off election.
e. a process of redrawing voting district lines from time to time and adjusting the number of representatives allotted each state.
reactions of an ester with a carboxylate group to form an anhydride. The R group is the same in each
Head of an Oba, Nigeria, Africa, Edo, Court of Benin.
Mask of an iyoba (queen mother), probably Idia, Court of Benin, Nigeria.
A severe case of delayed contact dermatitis (Type IV hypersensitivity) from wearing latex gloves.
5-4 The relationship between vapor pressure and temperature—in this case for water. As the ...
A case of breast cancer