The rule that a car passenger cannot challenge the ...

[Pineappleeh]

The rule that a car passenger cannot challenge the constitutionality of evidence seized from the car without standing to show a connection to the evidence is an example of the expectation of privacy doctrine created by Katz v. United States.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT considered an objective in ensuring probative information is
  recovered?
 
  A) To search for any and all malware that may have infected the system
  B) To recover deleted, existing, hidden, and password protected files
  C) To protect the computer system during the actual investigation
  D) To determine if steganography was used

[whitcassie]

Answer to Question 1

FALSE Rakas v. Illinois (1978 )

Answer to Question 2

A