Author Question: The rule that a car passenger cannot challenge the constitutionality of evidence seized from the car ... (Read 56 times)

Pineappleeh

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 585
The rule that a car passenger cannot challenge the constitutionality of evidence seized from the car without standing to show a connection to the evidence is an example of the expectation of privacy doctrine created by Katz v. United States.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Which of the following is NOT considered an objective in ensuring probative information is
  recovered?
 
  A) To search for any and all malware that may have infected the system
  B) To recover deleted, existing, hidden, and password protected files
  C) To protect the computer system during the actual investigation
  D) To determine if steganography was used



whitcassie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 298
Answer to Question 1

FALSE Rakas v. Illinois (1978 )

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

Did you know?

Earwax has antimicrobial properties that reduce the viability of bacteria and fungus in the human ear.

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

About 100 new prescription or over-the-counter drugs come into the U.S. market every year.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library