This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: How would a cognitive dissonance theorist counter the Freudian argument that catharsisblowing off ... (Read 86 times)

ghost!

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 560
How would a cognitive dissonance theorist counter the Freudian argument that catharsisblowing off steam to relieve the buildup of destructive aggressive impulseswill reduce aggression?
 
  Use an example of yelling or using sarcasm to vent our anger at someone who has angered us.
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Your six-year-old brother has developed some very distressing habits. He has become increasingly aggressive, destroying toys, hitting the neighbors' children, and threatening them with violence to take their toys away.
 
  You want to stop your little brother's destructive behavior using punishment. What would be the best way to do this?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

lorealeza77

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 356
Answer to Question 1

Answer: Dissonance theorists would argue that because people often engage in overkill when they are angered, a vicious spiral of aggression, self-justification, and more destructive aggression is likely to result. For example, when we verbally vent our anger or use sarcasm as a weapon against someone, it can be hurtful to them, and is at odds with our self-concepts as kind and reasonable people. Because we cannot undo this behavior, we will seek to preserve our self-esteem internally by convincing ourselves that the target of our anger must have deserved it. Once we use derogation to justify our verbal aggression, it becomes easier and easier to justify more destructive aggressive acts against them.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: First, because severe physical punishment can boomerang by teaching children that aggression is appropriate, it is best not to use severe physical punishment such as slapping or spanking. Threats of severe punishment would not be likely to work; such severe threats might provide your brother with external justification for refraining from hitting, throwing, and he will be unlikely to convince himself that such behavior is undesirable. To use punishment appropriately, it is important to remain vigilant around your little brother, and to make swift and reasonable interventions such as time-outs. It would also help to model nonaggressive alternatives for dealing with frustration and conflict.





 

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

Did you know?

There are major differences in the metabolism of morphine and the illegal drug heroin. Morphine mostly produces its CNS effects through m-receptors, and at k- and d-receptors. Heroin has a slight affinity for opiate receptors. Most of its actions are due to metabolism to active metabolites (6-acetylmorphine, morphine, and morphine-6-glucuronide).

Did you know?

Hip fractures are the most serious consequences of osteoporosis. The incidence of hip fractures increases with each decade among patients in their 60s to patients in their 90s for both women and men of all populations. Men and women older than 80 years of age show the highest incidence of hip fractures.

Did you know?

Elderly adults are living longer, and causes of death are shifting. At the same time, autopsy rates are at or near their lowest in history.

Did you know?

Inotropic therapy does not have a role in the treatment of most heart failure patients. These drugs can make patients feel and function better but usually do not lengthen the predicted length of their lives.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library