Did Congress intend to preserve an individual's right to a ...

[yoooooman]

Did Congress intend to preserve an individual's right to a judicial forum in an ADEA case from waiver?

Question 2

Hamish owned an office building with a fair market value of 250,000 . He insured it for 300,000 . When it burned down, he was entitled to:
 a. Nothing.
  b. 250,000 and a return of the excess premiums he paid on the 300,000 policy.
  c. 250,000.
  d. 300,000.

[raili21]

Answer to Question 1

No such intent to preserve an individual's right to a judicial forum is evident in the text or legislative history of the ADEA. Moreover, compulsory arbitration does not improperly deprive claimants of the judicial forum provided for by the ADEA. Congress did not explicitly preclude arbitration or other nonjudicial claims resolutions; and the ADEA's flexible approach to claims resolution, which permits the EEOC to pursue informal resolution methods, suggests that out-of-court dispute resolution is consistent with the statutory scheme.

Answer to Question 2

.C

[yoooooman]

TYSM

[vickyvicksss]

Wow, this really help