This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Did the Dissent concede that the Board Majority could legally overrule the Epilepsy Foundation ... (Read 65 times)

joesmith1212

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 549
Did the Dissent concede that the Board Majority could legally overrule the Epilepsy Foundation precedent?

Question 2

Section 7 of the NLRA states in part, employees shall have the rightto engage in concerted activities for the purposes ofmutual aid or protection.. The Board's construction of this language in Weingarten was that it created a statutory right in an employee to refuse to submit to an interview which the employee reasonably feared may result in discipline without union representation. Does this same language provide the same rights to unrepresented employees?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

rachel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

Yes. It stated that they overruled a sound decisionbecause they can.. The administrative process allows the Board to alter precedents to address changing circumstances according to the cumulative experience of the Board and the constant process of trial and error. Moreover, through the presidential appointment powers there can be an ever-changing composition of the Board. While a Board majority cannot create under the guise of interpretation a meaning for the Act that is unsustainable in order to achieve a desired result, the Board has the primary responsibility for applying the provisions of the Act to the complexities of industrial life, and as long as its interpretation is permissible, courts will defer to the expertise of the Board.
The IBM Corp. Board's interpretation of the Act is permissible, but not right according to the dissent. The dissent states that the majority overruled the Epilepsy decision not because they must or should, but simply because they can.. The IBM Corp. decision is well within the norms of the administrative process. The Board could legally do what it did do.

Answer to Question 2

For policy reasons, the Board majority decided that the above quoted language did not provide a right to unrepresented employees to have a coworker present during the investigatory interviews.




joesmith1212

  • Member
  • Posts: 549
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Excellent


deja

  • Member
  • Posts: 332
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Despite claims by manufacturers, the supplement known as Ginkgo biloba was shown in a study of more than 3,000 participants to be ineffective in reducing development of dementia and Alzheimer’s disease in older people.

Did you know?

Medication errors are more common among seriously ill patients than with those with minor conditions.

Did you know?

Asthma attacks and symptoms usually get started by specific triggers (such as viruses, allergies, gases, and air particles). You should talk to your doctor about these triggers and find ways to avoid or get rid of them.

Did you know?

Patients should never assume they are being given the appropriate drugs. They should make sure they know which drugs are being prescribed, and always double-check that the drugs received match the prescription.

Did you know?

Essential fatty acids have been shown to be effective against ulcers, asthma, dental cavities, and skin disorders such as acne.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library