Author Question: Did the city's action add restrictions where Congress intended that none should ... (Read 49 times)

future617RT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 543
Did the city's action add restrictions where Congress intended that none should exist?

Question 2

Summarize the essential facts of the case.



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Yes. Congress intended that the parties to a labor dispute should be free to use their economic weapons against one another. The city's action interfered with the normal bargaining self-help processes contemplated by Congress by imposing a durational limit on the exercise of self-help.

Answer to Question 2

The city conditioned the taxicab franchise renewal on the settlement of the employer's labor dispute with the union. Note: the Supreme Court's Machinists, Lodge 76 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission decision, precludes state regulation of conduct that Congress intended to be unregulated.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

On average, someone in the United States has a stroke about every 40 seconds. This is about 795,000 people per year.

Did you know?

When intravenous medications are involved in adverse drug events, their harmful effects may occur more rapidly, and be more severe than errors with oral medications. This is due to the direct administration into the bloodstream.

Did you know?

To maintain good kidney function, you should drink at least 3 quarts of water daily. Water dilutes urine and helps prevent concentrations of salts and minerals that can lead to kidney stone formation. Chronic dehydration is a major contributor to the development of kidney stones.

Did you know?

There are approximately 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States each year.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library