Author Question: Did the city's action add restrictions where Congress intended that none should ... (Read 54 times)

future617RT

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 543
Did the city's action add restrictions where Congress intended that none should exist?

Question 2

Summarize the essential facts of the case.



flexer1n1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
Answer to Question 1

Yes. Congress intended that the parties to a labor dispute should be free to use their economic weapons against one another. The city's action interfered with the normal bargaining self-help processes contemplated by Congress by imposing a durational limit on the exercise of self-help.

Answer to Question 2

The city conditioned the taxicab franchise renewal on the settlement of the employer's labor dispute with the union. Note: the Supreme Court's Machinists, Lodge 76 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission decision, precludes state regulation of conduct that Congress intended to be unregulated.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

Vital signs (blood pressure, temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate) should be taken before any drug administration. Patients should be informed not to use tobacco or caffeine at least 30 minutes before their appointment.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

A seasonal flu vaccine is the best way to reduce the chances you will get seasonal influenza and spread it to others.

Did you know?

Eating food that has been cooked with poppy seeds may cause you to fail a drug screening test, because the seeds contain enough opiate alkaloids to register as a positive.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library