Author Question: The use of mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts between investors and their brokerage firms ... (Read 103 times)

mikaylakyoung

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
The use of mandatory arbitration clauses in contracts between investors and their brokerage firms has been prohibited by the SEC.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Insider Reporting and Trading. Ronald Bleakney, an officer at Natural Microsystems Corp (NMC), a Section 12 corporation, directed NMC sales in North America, South America, and Europe. In November 1998, Bleakney sold more than 7,500 shares of NMC stock. The fol-lowing March, Bleakney resigned from the firm, and the next month, he bought more than 20,000 shares of its stock. NMC provided some guidance to employees concerning the rules of insider trading, and with regard to Bleakney's transactions, the corporation said nothing about potential liability. Richard Morales, an NMC shareholder, filed a suit against NMC and Bleakney to compel recovery, under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, of Bleakney's profits from the purchase and sale of his shares. (When Morales died, his executor Deborah Donoghue became the plaintiff.) Bleakney argued that he should not be liable because he relied on NMC's advice. Should the court order Bleakney to disgorge his profits? Explain.



djofnc

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

FALSE

Answer to Question 2

Insider reporting and trading
The court ordered Bleakney to disgorge his profits. The court explained that Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 precludes corporate insiders from making short-swing profits from transactions in the corporation's stock. The statute requires disgorgement to the company of any profit derived from the matching of any purchase and any sale of a . . . security . . . within a six-month period by a statutory insider, irrespective of intent or whether overall trading during that six months (i.e., all sales and purchases combined) resulted in a loss. For the statute to apply, it is not necessary to show any actual misuse of inside information or of any unlawful intent. Rather, Section 16(b) operates mechanically, and . . . imposes liability without fault. In this case, Bleakney was an NMC officer in November of 1998, when he sold the shares at issue . . . . To the extent Bleakney's duties as an officer may have been reassigned or limited after his resignation on March 22, 1999, his actions after that date still fall within the scope of Section 16(b), for all of the sales sought to be matched with subsequent purchases indisputably occurred prior to the resignation. The sales and purchases were within six months of one another. Bleakney's defense, that NMC provided guidance to its employees concerning executive and insider stock transactions but did not caution him as to potential liability under Section 16(b), is not available under that statute.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Every 10 seconds, a person in the United States goes to the emergency room complaining of head pain. About 1.2 million visits are for acute migraine attacks.

Did you know?

There are more nerve cells in one human brain than there are stars in the Milky Way.

Did you know?

Anesthesia awareness is a potentially disturbing adverse effect wherein patients who have been paralyzed with muscle relaxants may awaken. They may be aware of their surroundings but unable to communicate or move. Neurologic monitoring equipment that helps to more closely check the patient's anesthesia stages is now available to avoid the occurrence of anesthesia awareness.

Did you know?

More than 4.4billion prescriptions were dispensed within the United States in 2016.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library