In DeRosier v. Utility Systems, where DeRosier had more dirt ...

[gbarreiro]

In DeRosier v. Utility Systems, where DeRosier had more dirt dumped on his property than he wanted, the appeals court held that DeRosier could collect damages for the costs of removing the excess dirt dumped on his property.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Wal-Mart v. Samara Brothers, where Wal-Mart was accused of copying the design of children's clothing, the Supreme Court held that for trade dress protection to exist, the good or service must:
 a. be registered with the Trademark office b. be original
  c. have secondary meaning
  d. all of the other specific choices e. none of the other choices

[Jsherida]

Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

c

[gbarreiro]

Gracias!

[31809pancho]

TYSM