Intentional and wrongful interference with another person's ...

[rlane42]

Intentional and wrongful interference with another person's briefcase may be the tort of trespass to personal property.
 a. True
  b. False
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

In Slater Numismatics v. Driving Force, Driving Force was set up by former employees of a firm Slater worked closely with. Driving Force then move to capture business from a major client of Slater. Slater sued for interference with contractual relations. The appeals court held that Slater:
 a. failed to show improper interference with a contract, only possible interference with prospective customers
  b. could sue for intentional interference because Driving Force was shown to have profit motives for attempting to take away business
  c. had been defrauded by Driving Force
  d. could not sue Driving Force because it was a matter of hard but honest competition
  e. none of the other choices are correct

[bigcheese9]

Answer to Question 1

TRUE

Answer to Question 2

e