In BancorpSouth Bank v. Hazelwood Logistics Center, where the bank sued Hazelwood and its owners for payment, the defendants claimed the federal district court did not have jurisdiction because of a lack of diversity of citizenship. The appeals court held that:
a. the district court was correct in not dismissing the suit because state law allows parties to agree to apermissive forum selection clause.
b. the district court was incorrect in dismissing the claim because state law did not allow verbal adjustment of contracts
c. the district court was correct in dismissing the claim because state law did not allow verbal adjustment of contracts
d. none of the other choices are correct
Question 2
The general conflict-of-law rule for tort cases is that:
a. the law of the place where the defendant's attorney lives applies b. the law of the place where the defendant lives applies
c. the law of the place where the plaintiff lives applies d. the court may decide what law to apply
e. none of the other choices are correct
The proportion of obese and extremely obese adults in the United States has increased over the past
This slave burial service, painted by John Antrobus in 1860, reflects an inversion of power relation
Although the Democrats and the Republicans represent slightly different slices of the center, those ...
Total allowable and actual catch, Grand Bank Atlantic Cod 1959 -2012
A mother invests $9000 in a bank account at the time of her daughter's birth. The interest is ...