This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Tucker and Hankey were adjoining property owners. Tucker claimed that the fence separating their ... (Read 231 times)

rosent76

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
Tucker and Hankey were adjoining property owners. Tucker claimed that the fence separating their properties was not located properly and that it should be moved back onto Hankey's land. Hankey claimed that he owned the strip between the fence and the alleged boundary line by adverse possession. He proved that for forty (40 ) years there had been on the strip in question a barn with a cement floor, which had been built by the person from whom he purchased his land, and that he had been told by the former owner that the fence was the boundary line. The fence consisted of five-foot-high barbed wire set in cement. Did Hankey own the strip by adverse possession?

Question 2

Ulysses bought Whiteacre from Gordon but never recorded the deed. Gordon stayed on the property as a tenant for three (3 ) years. Near the end of the three (3 ) years, Gordon learned that Ulysses had never recorded the deed. Gordon advertised Whiteacre for sale and Cheryl negotiated with Gordon thinking that Gordon was the owner. Finally, Cheryl checked the records at the recording office and, finding no reason to question Gordon's ownership of the property, purchased Whiteacre from Gordon. Cheryl recorded the deed and Gordon fled with the purchase money. Meanwhile, Ulysses had failed to pay the real estate taxes on Whiteacre for the three (3 ) years in question thinking it was the responsibility of Gordon, the tenant. Ultimately, Cheryl and Ulysses disputed over the ownership of the property. Decide the case between Cheryl and Ulysses. Also decide whether Ulysses is responsible for the three (3 ) years of real estate taxes assessed while Gordon occupied the property as a tenant.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

asware1

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

Yes. The construction of a valuable improvement such as the barn, and the nature of the fence, showed that Hankey and the former owner had regarded themselves as the owners of the land in possession. Their possession was adverse and continuous, and it therefore satisfied the requirements of adverse possession.

Answer to Question 2

Ulysses loses on both counts. Ulysses was the owner of Whiteacre when Ulysses purchased the property and received the deed. As the owner, Ulysses was responsible for the real estate taxes. Because Ulysses failed to record the deed, a good faith purchaser, Cheryl, who relied on the records and did not know of Ulysses' ownership, defeats that ownership and becomes the owner. Cheryl ends up the owner of the property.




rosent76

  • Member
  • Posts: 516
Reply 2 on: Jun 24, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


adammoses97

  • Member
  • Posts: 337
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Excellent

 

Did you know?

Egg cells are about the size of a grain of sand. They are formed inside of a female's ovaries before she is even born.

Did you know?

Addicts to opiates often avoid treatment because they are afraid of withdrawal. Though unpleasant, with proper management, withdrawal is rarely fatal and passes relatively quickly.

Did you know?

Hypertension is a silent killer because it is deadly and has no significant early symptoms. The danger from hypertension is the extra load on the heart, which can lead to hypertensive heart disease and kidney damage. This occurs without any major symptoms until the high blood pressure becomes extreme. Regular blood pressure checks are an important method of catching hypertension before it can kill you.

Did you know?

Sildenafil (Viagra®) has two actions that may be of consequence in patients with heart disease. It can lower the blood pressure, and it can interact with nitrates. It should never be used in patients who are taking nitrates.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library