In the Kochi Hoso case, a Japanese radio broadcaster sued his employer for dismissal. As required by Japanese law, the employer maintained written rules specifying conditions for which the employee could be discharged. The employee was late for a broadcast on two occasions and was discharged pursuant to the written rules. The court ruled that:
A) the employee could be discharged because the rules were in writing according to Japanese law.
B) the employee could be discharged because of the seriousness of the offense.
C) the employee was reinstated to his job because the law was unconstitutional.
D) the employee was reinstated to his job because the discharge was significantly unreasonable under the circumstances and in violation of the socially accepted view.
Question 2
A Rent-a-Judge serves as a referee.
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Japanese Spitz
A nineteenth-century Japanese portrait of Commodore Matthew Perry, who “opened up” Japan in 1854.
Which aspect of executive functioning is required to play the game of “Simon Says,” in which ...
Ford uses an inertia switch to turn off the electric fuel pump in case of an accident.
5-4 The relationship between vapor pressure and temperature—in this case for water. As the ...
The family described in Example Case 2