Author Question: Sociology homework question on Locke, Euthanasia and other topics? (Read 2100 times)

Sandstorm

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 268
I'm looking for some other perspectives for homework. It's not due for another 5 days. I will incorporate your answers into my paper.

What do you think the Rights Based Ethics view (Locke, etc.) would be on euthanasia? What principles are involved here?
And do the same for abortion and capital punishment.

Don't worry, I am just going to write the paper and put a few other viewpoints in it. Your help is appreciated.



hummingbird

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
I've used the following link (only 3 pages)
http://academic.mu.edu/phil/jonesj/courses/p10420053rightsnotes.pdf
This link was an effect of searching for Rights Based Ethics on Yahoo...

As to the euthanasia, the proper category for it seems to be the positive natural right. It means, that suffering of somebody entitle me to act. The similar example is to provide food to starving person. Sometimes the aspect of rational mind is not involved, i. e. I exclude the rationality like criterion for having a property (the person is in a coma). But it involves a conflict, because euthanasia is violating the natural right to live, contrary to providing food to starving. What is the reason for reduce somebody on his right to live due to his suffering? It seems, that the chosen category was wrong. The correct category of right to euthanasia is conventional right, i. e. the one, which is imposed by society and here emerges again a question, if it is negative or positive conventional right. That is - does euthanasia interfere with conventional right of someone else or not? In Switzerland it principally doesn't.

Capital punishment can be supposed as conventional negative right in certain countries. Sorry, it should be rather conventional positive right of the majority to be saved from certain danger, because killing of somebody is in conflict with his natural positive rights (i. e. moral rights, which should have precedence before conventional rights).

However there is a principle, that natural (moral) rights should substitute the conventional rights in the cases, when there is absence of them for some reason. Here is incorporated the principle of soul, according to it euthanasia in the case of person in coma is not possible. What about, when the person alone ask for it? That is probably the case of conventional positive right (Switzerland).

Similarly abortion is not possible, when we ascribe a soul to the embryo. And we must consider the fact, that even the conventional positive right is excluded in this case. From this point of view abortion is really close to murder.

You will need to put my answer in order and perhaps make some additions to it. I am sorry, it was only an attempt...



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The first-known contraceptive was crocodile dung, used in Egypt in 2000 BC. Condoms were also reportedly used, made of animal bladders or intestines.

Did you know?

IgA antibodies protect body surfaces exposed to outside foreign substances. IgG antibodies are found in all body fluids. IgM antibodies are the first type of antibody made in response to an infection. IgE antibody levels are often high in people with allergies. IgD antibodies are found in tissues lining the abdomen and chest.

Did you know?

A serious new warning has been established for pregnant women against taking ACE inhibitors during pregnancy. In the study, the risk of major birth defects in children whose mothers took ACE inhibitors during the first trimester was nearly three times higher than in children whose mothers didn't take ACE inhibitors. Physicians can prescribe alternative medications for pregnant women who have symptoms of high blood pressure.

Did you know?

People who have myopia, or nearsightedness, are not able to see objects at a distance but only up close. It occurs when the cornea is either curved too steeply, the eye is too long, or both. This condition is progressive and worsens with time. More than 100 million people in the United States are nearsighted, but only 20% of those are born with the condition. Diet, eye exercise, drug therapy, and corrective lenses can all help manage nearsightedness.

Did you know?

Children with strabismus (crossed eyes) can be treated. They are not able to outgrow this condition on their own, but with help, it can be more easily corrected at a younger age. It is important for infants to have eye examinations as early as possible in their development and then another at age 2 years.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library