This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What has been the effect of NAFTA on employment in the United ... (Read 106 times)

09madisonrousseau09

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
What has been the effect of NAFTA on employment in the United States?

Question 2

The simple linear regression equation equals alpha ________ beta times X.
 a. minus
 b. times
 c. plus
 d. divided by



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Carliemb17

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 325
Answer to Question 1

Many people have argued that NAFTA has resulted in job losses in the United States. Some data shows that jobs have moved from the United States to Mexico because of its lower labor costs.

Answer to Question 2

c




09madisonrousseau09

  • Member
  • Posts: 559
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Wow, this really help


epscape

  • Member
  • Posts: 335
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

Though methadone is often used to treat dependency on other opioids, the drug itself can be abused. Crushing or snorting methadone can achieve the opiate "rush" desired by addicts. Improper use such as these can lead to a dangerous dependency on methadone. This drug now accounts for nearly one-third of opioid-related deaths.

Did you know?

As of mid-2016, 18.2 million people were receiving advanced retroviral therapy (ART) worldwide. This represents between 43–50% of the 34–39.8 million people living with HIV.

Did you know?

Only one in 10 cancer deaths is caused by the primary tumor. The vast majority of cancer mortality is caused by cells breaking away from the main tumor and metastasizing to other parts of the body, such as the brain, bones, or liver.

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library