This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: What is the most general method of conducting means comparisons that have been planned a priori? ... (Read 100 times)

asmith134

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 576
What is the most general method of conducting means comparisons that have been planned a priori?
 
  a. Loglinear analysis
  b. Contrast analysis
  c. Analysis of covariance
  d. Multiple regression

Question 2

A __________ analysis is a statistical procedure that is used when more than one nominal variable is used to predict a nominal outcome variable.
 
  a. loglinear
  b. contrast
  c. chi-square
  d. covariance



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

kswal303

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 316
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

a




asmith134

  • Member
  • Posts: 576
Reply 2 on: Jun 19, 2018
Gracias!


diana chang

  • Member
  • Posts: 288
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

Certain chemicals, after ingestion, can be converted by the body into cyanide. Most of these chemicals have been removed from the market, but some old nail polish remover, solvents, and plastics manufacturing solutions can contain these substances.

Did you know?

After 5 years of being diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis, one every three patients will no longer be able to work.

Did you know?

Always store hazardous household chemicals in their original containers out of reach of children. These include bleach, paint, strippers and products containing turpentine, garden chemicals, oven cleaners, fondue fuels, nail polish, and nail polish remover.

Did you know?

In women, pharmacodynamic differences include increased sensitivity to (and increased effectiveness of) beta-blockers, opioids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and typical antipsychotics.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library