Author Question: Which of the following might be considered disadvantages of secondary data? a. Secondary data are ... (Read 133 times)

james

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
Which of the following might be considered disadvantages of secondary data?
 a. Secondary data are more costly to collect than primary data.
  b. Secondary data typically do not fit completely the problem at hand.
  c. Secondary data are generally more accurate than primary data.
  d. Both b and c.
  e. None of the above might be considered disadvantages.

Question 2

Which of the following might NOT be considered a benefit of using secondary data?
 a. Secondary data help to state better the problem under investigation.
  b. Secondary data cost less to collect than primary data.
  c. Secondary data can suggest improved methods or data for addressing the research problem.
  d. Secondary data provide comparative data to which primary data can be compared.
  e. Secondary data better fit the problem under investigation.



Bigfoot1984

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

E



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Drying your hands with a paper towel will reduce the bacterial count on your hands by 45–60%.

Did you know?

Carbamazepine can interfere with the results of home pregnancy tests. If you are taking carbamazepine, do not try to test for pregnancy at home.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

Coca-Cola originally used coca leaves and caffeine from the African kola nut. It was advertised as a therapeutic agent and "pickerupper." Eventually, its formulation was changed, and the coca leaves were removed because of the effects of regulation on cocaine-related products.

Did you know?

When Gabriel Fahrenheit invented the first mercury thermometer, he called "zero degrees" the lowest temperature he was able to attain with a mixture of ice and salt. For the upper point of his scale, he used 96°, which he measured as normal human body temperature (we know it to be 98.6° today because of more accurate thermometers).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library