This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The trade-off between the present and future consumption is measured by A) the money cost of both ... (Read 82 times)

penguins

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 903
The trade-off between the present and future consumption is measured by
 
  A) the money cost of both the present and future consumption.
  B) the foregone present consumption.
  C) the difference between the money price of future goods and the money cost of producing them.
  D) the difference between the money price of present goods and the money cost of producing them.

Question 2

In general, any ceteris paribus determinant of supply that is favorable to production will
 
  A) cause a movement along the supply curve.
  B) shift the supply curve to the right.
  C) shift the demand curve to the left.
  D) shift the supply curve to the left.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

alvinum

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 317
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

B




penguins

  • Member
  • Posts: 903
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Wow, this really help


Dominic

  • Member
  • Posts: 328
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Great answer, keep it coming :)

 

Did you know?

About 3% of all pregnant women will give birth to twins, which is an increase in rate of nearly 60% since the early 1980s.

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

The average adult has about 21 square feet of skin.

Did you know?

Approximately 70% of expectant mothers report experiencing some symptoms of morning sickness during the first trimester of pregnancy.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library