This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Refer to Figure 4-15. As a result of the tax, is there a loss in consumer surplus? A) No, because ... (Read 65 times)

fagboi

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 535
Refer to Figure 4-15. As a result of the tax, is there a loss in consumer surplus?
 
  A) No, because the producer pays the tax.
  B) No, because the market reaches a new equilibrium
  C) No, because consumers are charged a lower price to cover their tax burden.
  D) Yes, because consumers pay a price above the economically efficient price.

Question 2

Assume that the hourly price for the services of tarot card readers has risen and sales of these services have also risen. One can conclude that
 
  A) the demand for tarot card readers has increased.
  B) the law of demand has been violated.
  C) the number of tarot card readers has increased.
  D) tarot card readers are deliberately charging high prices because they provide services for superstitious clients.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Pamela.irrgang@yahoo.com

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

D

Answer to Question 2

A




fagboi

  • Member
  • Posts: 535
Reply 2 on: Jun 29, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


okolip

  • Member
  • Posts: 362
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
:D TYSM

 

Did you know?

The first oncogene was discovered in 1970 and was termed SRC (pronounced "SARK").

Did you know?

Certain chemicals, after ingestion, can be converted by the body into cyanide. Most of these chemicals have been removed from the market, but some old nail polish remover, solvents, and plastics manufacturing solutions can contain these substances.

Did you know?

Oliver Wendell Holmes is credited with introducing the words "anesthesia" and "anesthetic" into the English language in 1846.

Did you know?

The shortest mature adult human of whom there is independent evidence was Gul Mohammed in India. In 1990, he was measured in New Delhi and stood 22.5 inches tall.

Did you know?

The Romans did not use numerals to indicate fractions but instead used words to indicate parts of a whole.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library