[Answered] The earliest statement of the principle of comparative advantage is associated with A) David ...

This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: The earliest statement of the principle of comparative advantage is associated with A) David ... (Read 127 times)

imanialler

Hero Member
Posts: 539

on: Jun 30, 2018

The earliest statement of the principle of comparative advantage is associated with

A) David Hume.
B) David Ricardo.
C) Adam Smith.
D) Eli Heckscher.
E) Bertil Ohlin.

Question 2

Economic growth could make a country worse off.

Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

rachel

Sr. Member
Posts: 323

Reply #1 on: Jun 30, 2018

Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

TRUE

imanialler

Member
Posts: 539

Reply 2 on: Jun 30, 2018

TYSM

meow1234

Member
Posts: 333

Reply 3 on: Yesterday

Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

« previous next »

Did you know?

The liver is the only organ that has the ability to regenerate itself after certain types of damage. As much as 25% of the liver can be removed, and it will still regenerate back to its original shape and size. However, the liver cannot regenerate after severe damage caused by alcohol.

Did you know?

Russia has the highest death rate from cardiovascular disease followed by the Ukraine, Romania, Hungary, and Poland.

Did you know?

Human stomach acid is strong enough to dissolve small pieces of metal such as razor blades or staples.

Did you know?

The effects of organophosphate poisoning are referred to by using the abbreviations “SLUD” or “SLUDGE,” It stands for: salivation, lacrimation, urination, defecation, GI upset, and emesis.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.