Author Question: Why didn't the surge in the monetary base between 2008-2012 lead to a similar surge in the money ... (Read 72 times)

swpotter12

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 527
Why didn't the surge in the monetary base between 2008-2012 lead to a similar surge in the money supply?
 
  A) The currency-deposit ratio rose significantly, resulting in a much smaller money multiplier.
  B) The excess reserve-deposit ratio rose significantly, resulting in a much smaller money multiplier.
  C) The Fed increase the required reserve ratio, resulting in a much smaller money multiplier.
  D) Nonborrowed reserves declined, offsetting the increase in the monetary base.

Question 2

The real business cycle model replicates the key business cycle regularities
 
  A) both qualitatively and quantitatively.
  B) qualitatively but not quantitatively.
  C) quantitatively but not qualitatively.
  D) neither qualitatively nor quantitatively.



InfiniteSteez

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

Certain chemicals, after ingestion, can be converted by the body into cyanide. Most of these chemicals have been removed from the market, but some old nail polish remover, solvents, and plastics manufacturing solutions can contain these substances.

Did you know?

Adolescents often feel clumsy during puberty because during this time of development, their hands and feet grow faster than their arms and legs do. The body is therefore out of proportion. One out of five adolescents actually experiences growing pains during this period.

Did you know?

Multiple experimental evidences have confirmed that at the molecular level, cancer is caused by lesions in cellular DNA.

Did you know?

Fungal nail infections account for up to 30% of all skin infections. They affect 5% of the general population—mostly people over the age of 70.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library