Author Question: A stock mutual fund is generally A) less risky than buying individual stocks. B) more risky than ... (Read 98 times)

cartlidgeashley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 572
A stock mutual fund is generally
 
  A) less risky than buying individual stocks.
  B) more risky than buying individual stocks.
  C) just as risky as buying individual stocks.
  D) a way for the rich to avoid taxes.

Question 2

Insurance companies do NOT cover losses that would
 
  A) happen to all of the policyholders at once.
  B) happen with a very low probability.
  C) happen to just a handful of policyholders.
  D) happen with uncertainty.


s.meritte

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question


 

Did you know?

The highest suicide rate in the United States is among people ages 65 years and older. Almost 15% of people in this age group commit suicide every year.

Did you know?

Fewer than 10% of babies are born on their exact due dates, 50% are born within 1 week of the due date, and 90% are born within 2 weeks of the date.

Did you know?

The cure for trichomoniasis is easy as long as the patient does not drink alcoholic beverages for 24 hours. Just a single dose of medication is needed to rid the body of the disease. However, without proper precautions, an individual may contract the disease repeatedly. In fact, most people develop trichomoniasis again within three months of their last treatment.

Did you know?

Hypertension is a silent killer because it is deadly and has no significant early symptoms. The danger from hypertension is the extra load on the heart, which can lead to hypertensive heart disease and kidney damage. This occurs without any major symptoms until the high blood pressure becomes extreme. Regular blood pressure checks are an important method of catching hypertension before it can kill you.

Did you know?

The shortest mature adult human of whom there is independent evidence was Gul Mohammed in India. In 1990, he was measured in New Delhi and stood 22.5 inches tall.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library