Author Question: If everyone's utility is given equal weight and a change in resource allocation results in one ... (Read 41 times)

fasfsadfdsfa

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 554
If everyone's utility is given equal weight and a change in resource allocation results in one person's gain exceeding another person's loss, we can say that the new allocation
 
  A) is Pareto superior to the original one.
  B) increases social welfare.
  C) decreases social welfare.
  D) is efficient.

Question 2

If the costs of labor and capital increase in the same proportion, the isocost line will
 
  A) stay the same.
  B) shift outward in a parallel fashion.
  C) rotate inward around the point where only capital is employed in production.
  D) shift inward in a parallel fashion.


mbcrismon

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 328
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

There are more sensory neurons in the tongue than in any other part of the body.

Did you know?

In most cases, kidneys can recover from almost complete loss of function, such as in acute kidney (renal) failure.

Did you know?

Many people have small pouches in their colons that bulge outward through weak spots. Each pouch is called a diverticulum. About 10% of Americans older than age 40 years have diverticulosis, which, when the pouches become infected or inflamed, is called diverticulitis. The main cause of diverticular disease is a low-fiber diet.

Did you know?

Only 12 hours after an egg cell is fertilized by a sperm cell, the egg cell starts to divide. As it continues to divide, it moves along the fallopian tube toward the uterus at about 1 inch per day.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library