This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: A two-part price is less efficient than a Ramsey. Indicate whether the statement is true or ... (Read 48 times)

jayhills49

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 559
A two-part price is less efficient than a Ramsey.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Question 2

Ramsey pricing avoids cross subsidy.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

akudia

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 347
Answer to Question 1

F The two-part price can be more efficient. Think of it this way: Each part of a two-part price may be set as a Ramsey price and two Ramsey prices should be better than one. With two prices there is opportunity for more subtle adjustment.

Answer to Question 2

F It is possible to have Ramsey prices that cross subsidize.




jayhills49

  • Member
  • Posts: 559
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


fatboyy09

  • Member
  • Posts: 358
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Gracias!

 

Did you know?

Atropine was named after the Greek goddess Atropos, the oldest and ugliest of the three sisters known as the Fates, who controlled the destiny of men.

Did you know?

The B-complex vitamins and vitamin C are not stored in the body and must be replaced each day.

Did you know?

Your heart beats over 36 million times a year.

Did you know?

Though the United States has largely rejected the metric system, it is used for currency, as in 100 pennies = 1 dollar. Previously, the British currency system was used, with measurements such as 12 pence to the shilling, and 20 shillings to the pound.

Did you know?

In the United States, an estimated 50 million unnecessary antibiotics are prescribed for viral respiratory infections.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library