This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following distinctions helps to explain the difference between relevant and irrelevant ... (Read 59 times)

shofmannx20

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 562
Which of the following distinctions helps to explain the difference between relevant and irrelevant cost?
 
  A) accounting cost vs. direct cost
  B) historical cost vs. replacement cost
  C) sunk cost vs. fixed cost
  D) variable cost vs. incremental cost

Question 2

A positive cost-benefit ration implies that the activity or program should be undertaken.
 
  a. True b. False



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

chevyboi1976

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 344
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

b




shofmannx20

  • Member
  • Posts: 562
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
:D TYSM


meganmoser117

  • Member
  • Posts: 303
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Children of people with alcoholism are more inclined to drink alcohol or use hard drugs. In fact, they are 400 times more likely to use hard drugs than those who do not have a family history of alcohol addiction.

Did you know?

Patients should never assume they are being given the appropriate drugs. They should make sure they know which drugs are being prescribed, and always double-check that the drugs received match the prescription.

Did you know?

To maintain good kidney function, you should drink at least 3 quarts of water daily. Water dilutes urine and helps prevent concentrations of salts and minerals that can lead to kidney stone formation. Chronic dehydration is a major contributor to the development of kidney stones.

Did you know?

Side effects from substance abuse include nausea, dehydration, reduced productivitiy, and dependence. Though these effects usually worsen over time, the constant need for the substance often overcomes rational thinking.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library