This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: When ethnographers get too close to their subjects so that they no longer can critically evaluate ... (Read 103 times)

student77

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 567
When ethnographers get too close to their subjects so that they no longer can critically evaluate other people's perspectives, it is called
 
  a. going native..
  b. going under the knife..
  c. knowing the subject..
  d. undisturbed data..

Question 2

Which of the following terms is used currently in studying one's self?
 
  a. autobiography
  b. auto-ethnography
  c. autonomic reflex
  d. auto-interpretation



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

pocatato

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 333
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

B




student77

  • Member
  • Posts: 567
Reply 2 on: Jul 1, 2018
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it


mcabuhat

  • Member
  • Posts: 344
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Cutaneous mucormycosis is a rare fungal infection that has been fatal in at least 29% of cases, and in as many as 83% of cases, depending on the patient's health prior to infection. It has occurred often after natural disasters such as tornados, and early treatment is essential.

Did you know?

Certain chemicals, after ingestion, can be converted by the body into cyanide. Most of these chemicals have been removed from the market, but some old nail polish remover, solvents, and plastics manufacturing solutions can contain these substances.

Did you know?

The shortest mature adult human of whom there is independent evidence was Gul Mohammed in India. In 1990, he was measured in New Delhi and stood 22.5 inches tall.

Did you know?

Patients should never assume they are being given the appropriate drugs. They should make sure they know which drugs are being prescribed, and always double-check that the drugs received match the prescription.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library