Author Question: Distinguish between a social group and a social category. What will be an ideal ... (Read 72 times)

saraeharris

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 546
Distinguish between a social group and a social category.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

A major difference between the modern multinational corporation and seventeenth-century trading firms like the Dutch East India Company is that:
 
  a. early trading firms had access to more capital
  b. early trading firms were much more powerful corporations
  c. modern corporations are not granted exclusive rights to trade with other nations
  d. modern corporations are likely to rely on military conquest to achieve their goals



ecabral0

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Answer to Question 1

A social category is a collection of individuals who are grouped together because they share a trait that is deemed by the observer to be socially relevant. A social group is a plurality of people whose members are recruited according to some membership criterion and are bound together by a set of membership rights and mutual obligations.

Answer to Question 2

C



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The human body's pharmacokinetics are quite varied. Our hair holds onto drugs longer than our urine, blood, or saliva. For example, alcohol can be detected in the hair for up to 90 days after it was consumed. The same is true for marijuana, cocaine, ecstasy, heroin, methamphetamine, and nicotine.

Did you know?

Women are 50% to 75% more likely than men to experience an adverse drug reaction.

Did you know?

The top five reasons that children stay home from school are as follows: colds, stomach flu (gastroenteritis), ear infection (otitis media), pink eye (conjunctivitis), and sore throat.

Did you know?

More than 4.4billion prescriptions were dispensed within the United States in 2016.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library