Author Question: Discuss tracking and the effects of teacher and student expectations on school achievement. What ... (Read 32 times)

Redwolflake15

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 569
Discuss tracking and the effects of teacher and student expectations on school achievement.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Discuss the results of the way public education is funded in the United States. Why does the chapter refer to this funding as upside down?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



juwms

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 337
Answer to Question 1

Feedback: Tracking (or ability grouping) sorts students into different groups or classes according to their perceived intellectual ability. The decision is based on grades and teachers' judgments but primarily through standardized tests. The result is that children from low-income families and from ethnic minorities are overrepresented in the slow track, whereas children from advantaged backgrounds are disproportionately in the middle and upper tracks. The purpose is to enhance learning by allowing children of similar abilities to work at the same pace. While there are benefits, there are also drawbacks to tracking. There are four principal reasons this system stunts the success of students who are negatively labeled: stigma, self-fulfilling prophesies, beliefs about future payoffs to education, and the creation of negative student subcultures.

Answer to Question 2

Feedback: Public schools receive about 10 of their funds from the federal government, about 45 from the state (depending on the allocation within each state), and 45 from local taxes. Schools are funded unequally, with public schools being more successful in educating children in middle-class communities but often failing children in poor neighborhoods. The top-spending states invest more than twice the amount per pupil than those states spending the least. The tradition of funding public schools primarily through local property taxes is discriminatory because rich school districts can spend more than poor ones on each student and at a lower tax rate. Financing of public education is upside down. The schools and students who need the most help receive the least, whereas those with advantages are advantaged all the more. Further, money spent on schools serving low-income students was more likely used to fund basic repairs, whereas schools in more affluent districts were more likely to add science labs, technology, or other new programs. As President Obama said, For low income students, the schools are made less decrepit; for wealthier students, they are made more enriching.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

More than nineteen million Americans carry the factor V gene that causes blood clots, pulmonary embolism, and heart disease.

Did you know?

Adult head lice are gray, about ? inch long, and often have a tiny dot on their backs. A female can lay between 50 and 150 eggs within the several weeks that she is alive. They feed on human blood.

Did you know?

The lipid bilayer is made of phospholipids. They are arranged in a double layer because one of their ends is attracted to water while the other is repelled by water.

Did you know?

Malaria mortality rates are falling. Increased malaria prevention and control measures have greatly improved these rates. Since 2000, malaria mortality rates have fallen globally by 60% among all age groups, and by 65% among children under age 5.

Did you know?

During the twentieth century, a variant of the metric system was used in Russia and France in which the base unit of mass was the tonne. Instead of kilograms, this system used millitonnes (mt).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library