This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Convert 4.5 inches to an equivalent amount in centimeters. 1. 1.8 centimeters 2. 11.25 ... (Read 88 times)

biggirl4568

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 551
Convert 4.5 inches to an equivalent amount in centimeters.
 
  1. 1.8 centimeters
  2. 11.25 centimeters
  3. 2 centimeters
  4. 9.9 centimeters

Question 2

What would the higher per dose dosage in mcg be for a 93 lb client?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

Pamela.irrgang@yahoo.com

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

2
Rationale 1:

Answer to Question 2

6345 mcg/dose




biggirl4568

  • Member
  • Posts: 551
Reply 2 on: Jul 3, 2018
:D TYSM


anyusername12131

  • Member
  • Posts: 327
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Wow, this really help

 

Did you know?

Persons who overdose with cardiac glycosides have a better chance of overall survival if they can survive the first 24 hours after the overdose.

Did you know?

Cancer has been around as long as humankind, but only in the second half of the twentieth century did the number of cancer cases explode.

Did you know?

Astigmatism is the most common vision problem. It may accompany nearsightedness or farsightedness. It is usually caused by an irregularly shaped cornea, but sometimes it is the result of an irregularly shaped lens. Either type can be corrected by eyeglasses, contact lenses, or refractive surgery.

Did you know?

Though newer “smart” infusion pumps are increasingly becoming more sophisticated, they cannot prevent all programming and administration errors. Health care professionals that use smart infusion pumps must still practice the rights of medication administration and have other professionals double-check all high-risk infusions.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library