Answer to Question 1
Answer: B
Explanation: Though division of labor can show productivity increases, it has drawbacks that include low worker morale and, after an initial boost in productivity, a subsequent drop due to boredom and task repetition. These factors together eliminate permanent productivity increases and having no drawbacks since division of labor clearly does have drawbacks. Working only in very small organizations is wrong because, if anything, division of labor works best in large, not small, organizations. With the other choices ruled out, the only answer that makes sense for this question is has drawbacks.
Answer to Question 2
Answer: D
Explanation: Proponents of division of labor such as Adam Smith touted its ability to increase productivity, making this choice the correct response. If anything, division of labor had little effect on sales and product quality and served to decrease, rather than improve, employee morale.
A permanent epicardial pacemaker. The pulse generator can be placed in subcutaneous pockets in the s
dinosaurs were real
Like most world-changing inventions, the printing press of fifteenth-century Europe took advantage o
Desmosomes and gap junctions, as shown in heart muscle.
Proportion of Women and Men in the U.S. Labor Force
The Importance in the World Fossil Fuel Economy