This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Identify the advantages and disadvantages of group decision making. What will be an ideal ... (Read 66 times)

cabate

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 537
Identify the advantages and disadvantages of group decision making.
 
  What will be an ideal response?

Question 2

Robert is the CEO of a manufacturing plant. He believes that smaller teams are more effective than larger ones. Do you think this is the right strategy? Why or why not?
 
  What will be an ideal response?



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

mk6555

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 310
Answer to Question 1

Answer: Advantages
a. Generate more complete information and knowledge: A group brings a diversity of experience and perspectives to the decision process that an individual cannot.
b. More diverse alternatives: Because groups have a greater amount and diversity of information, they can identify more diverse alternatives than an individual.
c. Increased acceptance of a solution: Group members are reluctant to fight or undermine a decision they have helped develop.
d. Increased legitimacy: Decisions made by groups may be perceived as being more legitimate than decisions made unilaterally by one person.
Disadvantages
a. Time consuming: Groups almost always take more time to reach a solution than it would take an individual.
b. Minority domination: The inequality of group members creates the opportunity for one or more members to dominate others. A dominant and vocal minority frequently can have an excessive influence on the final decision.
c. Pressures to conform: Groupthink undermines critical thinking in the group and eventually harms the quality of the final decision.
d. Ambiguous responsibility: Group members share responsibility, but the responsibility of any single member is diluted.

Answer to Question 2

Answer: Group size affects performance and satisfaction, but the effect depends on what the group is supposed to accomplish. Smaller teams would be effective for regular tasks that require control. Research indicates that small groups are faster at completing tasks than are larger ones. However, for groups engaged in problem solving, large groups consistently get better results than smaller ones. Larger teams are preferred if the team needs diverse output. Smaller teams are preferred otherwise.




cabate

  • Member
  • Posts: 537
Reply 2 on: Jul 6, 2018
Excellent


atrochim

  • Member
  • Posts: 331
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

Over time, chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections can progress to advanced liver disease, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Unlike other forms, more than 80% of hepatitis C infections become chronic and lead to liver disease. When combined with hepatitis B, hepatitis C now accounts for 75% percent of all cases of liver disease around the world. Liver failure caused by hepatitis C is now leading cause of liver transplants in the United States.

Did you know?

Malaria was not eliminated in the United States until 1951. The term eliminated means that no new cases arise in a country for 3 years.

Did you know?

The training of an anesthesiologist typically requires four years of college, 4 years of medical school, 1 year of internship, and 3 years of residency.

Did you know?

Barbituric acid, the base material of barbiturates, was first synthesized in 1863 by Adolph von Bayer. His company later went on to synthesize aspirin for the first time, and Bayer aspirin is still a popular brand today.

Did you know?

Every 10 seconds, a person in the United States goes to the emergency room complaining of head pain. About 1.2 million visits are for acute migraine attacks.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library