Strain is different from stress in that: A) strain is less serious than stress. B) strain is a ...

Author Question: Strain is different from stress in that: A) strain is less serious than stress. B) strain is a ... (Read 94 times)

deesands

Hero Member
Posts: 514

on: Jul 7, 2018

Strain is different from stress in that:

A) strain is less serious than stress.
B) strain is a reaction to stress.
C) strain is a cause of stress.
D) strain refers to physical reactions, while stress refers to mental reactions.

Question 2

Recruiting programs have little impact on a firm's financial status.

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

dudman123

Sr. Member
Posts: 304

Reply #1 on: Jul 7, 2018

Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

Answer: FALSE

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question

« previous next »

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

About one in five American adults and teenagers have had a genital herpes infection—and most of them don't know it. People with genital herpes have at least twice the risk of becoming infected with HIV if exposed to it than those people who do not have genital herpes.

Did you know?

Most childhood vaccines are 90–99% effective in preventing disease. Side effects are rarely serious.

Did you know?

Over time, chronic hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections can progress to advanced liver disease, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Unlike other forms, more than 80% of hepatitis C infections become chronic and lead to liver disease. When combined with hepatitis B, hepatitis C now accounts for 75% percent of all cases of liver disease around the world. Liver failure caused by hepatitis C is now leading cause of liver transplants in the United States.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.