This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: An analysis of many studies about personality and job performance indicated that ... (Read 46 times)

Metfan725

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
An analysis of many studies about personality and job performance
   indicated that conscientiousness was important for success in
 
  a. lower-level, but not higher-level, positions.
  b. all the jobs studied.
  c. all but managerial positions.
   d. primarily customer-contact positions.

Question 2

Employees need positive reinforcement now and then if they are to keep their personal productivity at a high level.
 
  Indicate whether the statement is true or false



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

anoriega3

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 323
Answer to Question 1

b

Answer to Question 2

T




Metfan725

  • Member
  • Posts: 552
Reply 2 on: Jul 7, 2018
Great answer, keep it coming :)


jomama

  • Member
  • Posts: 346
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
Thanks for the timely response, appreciate it

 

Did you know?

As many as 20% of Americans have been infected by the fungus known as Histoplasmosis. While most people are asymptomatic or only have slight symptoms, infection can progress to a rapid and potentially fatal superinfection.

Did you know?

Glaucoma is a leading cause of blindness. As of yet, there is no cure. Everyone is at risk, and there may be no warning signs. It is six to eight times more common in African Americans than in whites. The best and most effective way to detect glaucoma is to receive a dilated eye examination.

Did you know?

The modern decimal position system was the invention of the Hindus (around 800 AD), involving the placing of numerals to indicate their value (units, tens, hundreds, and so on).

Did you know?

People about to have surgery must tell their health care providers about all supplements they take.

Did you know?

Although the Roman numeral for the number 4 has always been taught to have been "IV," according to historians, the ancient Romans probably used "IIII" most of the time. This is partially backed up by the fact that early grandfather clocks displayed IIII for the number 4 instead of IV. Early clockmakers apparently thought that the IIII balanced out the VIII (used for the number 8) on the clock face and that it just looked better.

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library