This topic contains a solution. Click here to go to the answer

Author Question: Which of the following is a major drawback of ethnocentric staffing? A) high costs of relocating ... (Read 123 times)

Bob-Dole

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 547
Which of the following is a major drawback of ethnocentric staffing?
 
  A) high costs of relocating managers
  B) loss of control over host-country operations
  C) loss of control over home-country operations
  D) difficulty in the transfer of special know-how between branches

Question 2

Which of the following statements regarding ethnocentric staffing is true?
 
  A) It can facilitate the transfer of special know-how.
  B) It is a relatively inexpensive policy to implement.
  C) It allows a company to blend in with the local market.
  D) It is a poor choice for companies operating in highly nationalistic markets.



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
Marked as best answer by a Subject Expert

ebonylittles

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
Answer to Question 1

A

Answer to Question 2

A




Bob-Dole

  • Member
  • Posts: 547
Reply 2 on: Jul 7, 2018
:D TYSM


JaynaD87

  • Member
  • Posts: 368
Reply 3 on: Yesterday
YES! Correct, THANKS for helping me on my review

 

Did you know?

More than 150,000 Americans killed by cardiovascular disease are younger than the age of 65 years.

Did you know?

The most dangerous mercury compound, dimethyl mercury, is so toxic that even a few microliters spilled on the skin can cause death. Mercury has been shown to accumulate in higher amounts in the following types of fish than other types: swordfish, shark, mackerel, tilefish, crab, and tuna.

Did you know?

Blood is approximately twice as thick as water because of the cells and other components found in it.

Did you know?

No drugs are available to relieve parathyroid disease. Parathyroid disease is caused by a parathyroid tumor, and it needs to be removed by surgery.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library