Author Question: Analyzing appropriate hardware requirements is necessary when implementing a new information system. ... (Read 96 times)

leo leo · **on:** Jul 7, 2018

Analyzing appropriate hardware requirements is necessary when implementing a new information system. Which of the following solutions is most appropriate?

1. Needs assessment information is compared to budget and hardware and software features.
2. Thin clients are placed in central locations to access the system.
3. Staff may elect to use their own personal digital assistants to send and receive client data.
4. Laser printers are connected to the system network for printing laboratory results.

Question 2

Post-disaster feedback is crucial to the design and implementation of a better continuity plan for future health care agency use. Which of the following supports this statement?

1. The feedback should be used to identify what worked and what did not. Plans that looked good before a disaster may not look so good after one.
2. Feedback collected after disasters (or mock disasters) is not useful since the staff had no other options during the disaster.
3. Feedback collected after disasters (or mock disasters) is not necessarily accurate.
4. Feedback collected after disasters (or mock disasters) provides data for change in a limited number of areas.

LegendaryAnswers · **Reply #1 on:** Jul 7, 2018

Answer to Question 1

1
Rationale: The needs assessment provides information on workflow and desired features. Comparison against budget constraints and data security concerns help to identify the best options available for the scope of the project. All hardware must be accounted for so that efficient use is enhanced; these decisions must be made in advance. Unauthorized hardware may not connect properly, and should be discouraged.

Answer to Question 2

1
Rationale: Feedback collected after disasters (or mock disasters) is key to the design and implementation of a better continuity plan for use in future disasters. The feedback should be used to identify what worked and what did not. Plans that looked good before a disaster may not look so good after one.