Author Question: When a researcher concludes that a particular result in the study is unlikely to have happened by ... (Read 65 times)

MGLQZ

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 579
When a researcher concludes that a particular result in the study is unlikely to have happened by chance alone, that finding is said to:
 
  A) probably be important in future studies
  B) be statistically significant in this study
  C) guarantee the results will happen again
  D) reflect a normal distribution of values

Question 2

In the following situation, which test should be used? Independent variable = educational status (high school diploma vs. Bachelor's degree vs.
 
  graduate degree); dependent variable = frequency of insomnia (1= never, 2 = 1-5 times/year; 3 = 6-10 times/year; 4 = 11-25 times/year; 5 = 25-49 times/year; 6 = 50+ times/year) a. Chi-square test
  b. Kruskal-Wallis test
  c. Cochran's Q
  d. McNemar test



s.meritte

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 306
Answer to Question 1

B

Answer to Question 2

B



Related Topics

Need homework help now?

Ask unlimited questions for free

Ask a Question
 

Did you know?

The senior population grows every year. Seniors older than 65 years of age now comprise more than 13% of the total population. However, women outlive men. In the 85-and-over age group, there are only 45 men to every 100 women.

Did you know?

Complications of influenza include: bacterial pneumonia, ear and sinus infections, dehydration, and worsening of chronic conditions such as asthma, congestive heart failure, or diabetes.

Did you know?

In 2012, nearly 24 milliion Americans, aged 12 and older, had abused an illicit drug, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA).

Did you know?

About 3% of all pregnant women will give birth to twins, which is an increase in rate of nearly 60% since the early 1980s.

Did you know?

Dogs have been used in studies to detect various cancers in human subjects. They have been trained to sniff breath samples from humans that were collected by having them breathe into special tubes. These people included 55 lung cancer patients, 31 breast cancer patients, and 83 cancer-free patients. The dogs detected 54 of the 55 lung cancer patients as having cancer, detected 28 of the 31 breast cancer patients, and gave only three false-positive results (detecting cancer in people who didn't have it).

For a complete list of videos, visit our video library